tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682614850676900522.post1527006031455454769..comments2009-08-02T21:33:13.659+10:00Gordon Monrohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04481697196573109161noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682614850676900522.post-25999218672440799842009-08-02T21:33:13.659+10:002009-08-02T21:33:13.659+10:00I had not previously heard of digimodernism; the introduction to Alan Kirby&#39;s book &quot;Digimodernism&quot; is on Alan&#39;s website at http://www.alanfkirby.com/. I don&#39;t know enough about either digimodernism or complexism to comment in any detail, but at first glance, digimodernism is much more specifically about &quot;digital textuality&quot;; Galanter&#39;s project is admittedly embryonic but potentially more wide-ranging, and has a more substantial engagement with science. I&#39;m willing to be corrected!Gordon Monrohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04481697196573109161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682614850676900522.post-69371864352880615292009-08-01T00:17:04.729+10:002009-08-01T00:17:04.729+10:00Complexism seems to cover similar ground to my own digimodernism.Alanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07908603475383324429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682614850676900522.post-81753657862344058162009-07-27T13:26:42.235+10:002009-07-27T13:26:42.235+10:00Hi Gordon. Warren Burt pointed out your post on this article. You may be interested in my comments, blogged here: http://worrall.avatar.com.au/blog/?p=123<br />ciao, DavidDavid Worrallhttp://worrall.avatar.com.au/blog/noreply@blogger.com